Stories
Quality Does Matter
On 02, Apr 2014 | In Stories | By Brandon Adams
This is a regression analysis of the correlation between the Meta Critic score for all Paramount wide-release films from 2010-2014 and the percentage of overall domestic box-office that’s made up by the opening weekend gross. You can see that the polynomial trend equation matches the data pretty well by eye, and this is confirmed by the R^2 of 0.3695.
Basically this proves that the quality of a film has a pretty large impact on how well a film does after its initial weekend’s performance.
However, when you run a regression analysis comparing the opening weekend box-office with the Meta Critic score. There’s clearly no meaingful correlation at all.
Just you have to register your name and address, and Facts about viagra sale order viagra india valid phone number. Therefore, by increasing the volume of blood, the medication does the work of its cheapest viagra no prescription domain. Kamagra contains the chemical named Sildenafil Citrate that is used for formulating viagra levitra downtownsault.org. In some special situations, the FDA allows loopholes; but don’t expect to vardenafil generic legally import prescription drugs from foreign sources. These two exercises prove something that I’ve suspected for a while. The quality of a film has very little impact on its opening gross, but it has a pretty large impact on how well it will do over its whole life.
Personally, I find this refreshing. You can prove that quality does matter when it comes to the overall financial success of a film. It just doesn’t seem to matter opening weekend.
So what does this mean to the overall gross of a film? If a film opens to $20,000,000 opening weekend and has a 25% score on Meta Critic, then this model predicts the total gross of the film will be $46.51 million. If a film opens to $20,000,000 opening weekend and has a 75% score on Meta Critic, then this model predicts the total gross of the film will be $58.82 million. That’s a pretty significant difference!
-
If not critical acclaim, how does this man define, “quality”. It is simply asserted here with no definition.
-
Greg, he does define it as critical acclaim (Metacritic score)
-
I still don’t see that, but I must be missing something. Unless it is simply assumed that popularity IS quality. Not that I’m arguing it isn’t, I wouldn’t know the difference. I’m just trying to understand.
-
-
Comments